ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the anesthetic effect of low dose remifentanil in patients undergoing sequential painless gastroscopy and painless colonoscopy in accordance with intravenous induction of propofol.@*Methods@#From July 2017 to January 2018, 86 patients who needed painless gastroscopy and painless colonoscopy in sequence were selected as observation objects in the Second Hospital of Jiaxing and were divided into control group and observation group according to random number table method, with 43 cases in each group.The control group was anesthetized with propofol only, while the observation group was anesthetized with low dose remifentanil in accordance with propofol.The occurrence of adverse reactions and recovery were compared between the two groups.@*Results@#The incidence rate of adverse reactions of the control group was 20.93%(9/43), which of the observation group was 13.95%(6/43), there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.272, P=394). The recovery time and the observation time after awakening in the observation group were (7.19±1.98)min and (6.94±2.04)min, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(10.33±2.42)min and (11.69±3.21)min], the differences were statistically significant (t=6.585, 8.190, P=0.000, 0.000).@*Conclusion@#Intravenous induction with low dose remifentanil combined with propofol in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy and painless colonoscopy in sequence has less adverse reactions, good anesthesia persistence and short recovery time, which is worthy of clinical popularization.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the anesthetic effect of low dose remifentanil in patients undergoing sequential painless gastroscopy and painless colonoscopy in accordance with intravenous induction of propofol. Methods From July 2017 to January 2018,86 patients who needed painless gastroscopy and painless colonoscopy in sequence were selected as observation objects in the Second Hospital of Jiaxing and were divided into control group and observation group according to random number table method,with 43 cases in each group.The control group was anesthetized with propofol only,while the observation group was anesthetized with low dose remifentanil in accordance with propofol.The occurrence of adverse reactions and recovery were compared between the two groups.Results The incidence rate of adverse reactions of the control group was 20.93% (9/43),which of the observation group was 13.95% (6/43),there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2 =0.272,P=394).The recovery time and the observation time after awakening in the observation group were (7.19 ± 1.98)min and (6.94 ± 2.04)min,respectively,which were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(10.33 ± 2.42) min and (11.69 ± 3. 21 ) min], the differences were statistically significant ( t = 6. 585, 8. 190, P = 0. 000, 0. 000 ). Conclusion Intravenous induction with low dose remifentanil combined with propofol in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy and painless colonoscopy in sequence has less adverse reactions,good anesthesia persistence and short recovery time,which is worthy of clinical popularization.